(SNN) - Last year Facebook (FB) refused to remove hate speech directed at women, because they are women, including that directed at Congressional Representative Jackie Speier, D-California. Their answer to complaints by myself, and many others, was that such speech (rape and death threats, as well as speech and pictures that denigrated women and encouraged violence against women and military women) were not against their policy. In fact Facebook was quick to remove a photo of a same sex couple kissing (fully dressed), while allowing rape and death threats against females to remain. It was only after pressure put on Facebook by Rep. Speier's office, thousands of feminists--both male and female--and eventually the military, and Facebook advertisers that Facebook finally removed such posts and pages. The military became involved because some of the pages spewing hate at women were created and maintained by self-identified military enlisted members. Military leaders admitted having known about some of the pages for at least three years, but apparently lacked the will to do anything about them until pressured by Rep. Speier. You can read about some of these issues with Facebook and with the Marines here, here, here, here, and here. Other self-identified military branch members and also civilians contributed to the hate speech on Facebook. Facebook is now making an effort to police speech and pictures that promote misogyny and violence against females.
The World English Dictionary online defines terrorism as the "systematic use of violence and intimidation to achieve some goal." When used against women, its goal is often to silence them and to make them disappear from venues such as science groups and domains (physical or virtual) predominantly seen by many males as their sacred ground. Threats of violence, usually rape and murder, are often aimed at women audacious enough to speak their minds in public venues such as the Internet. This kind of terrorism comes under the definition of hate speech (For the definition of "hate speech" go here, and for the definition of "hate crime" go here.).
Throughout the world crimes against females are allowed to continue directly and by the simple act of not fully investigating or prosecuting such crimes. Refusal to include females as a class in laws that keep statistics for and define hate speech and hate crimes is another way of ignoring hate crimes against females. Societies allow gender-biased terrorists to commit hate speech and hate crimes against females with little or no punishment, even when there are laws against such crimes.
The United States has also failed to develop the will to declare crimes, such as can be defined, as hate speech or defined as hate crimes against females as crimes, and to prosecute them accordingly. When the Hate Crimes Statistics Act was passed it excluded hate crimes against women as a class, according to civilrights.org, In addition, the information on civilrights.org adds, "Other federal laws and many state hate crime statutes also exclude bias crimes targeting women." This means that misogynists are free to commit hate speech directed at females that not only terrorizes, but contributes to creating a culture of misogyny leading to increased violent acts against females. In allowing hate speech, cultures are giving tacit permission to criminals to take the violence further than just speech.
A new bill, The Hate Crime Reporting Act of 2014 (S.2219) and its House companion bill (The Hate Crime Reporting Act, H.R. 3878), seek to study and report on whether Internet and other telecommunications are encouraging hate crimes, and it includes gender in its list of classes of people. The bills are meant to update a 20-year study already being carried out. The Senate bill specifically addresses the First Amendment: The report is to "...include any recommendations, consistent with the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, that the NTIA determines are appropriate and necessary to address the use of telecommunications..." (in hate crimes). The House bill uses similar language to address the First Amendment in its recommendations.
I believe in the First Amendment, but I also believe there's a difference between valid criticism (and differing belief systems) and hate speech. Glenn Beck has already spoken against the legislation, claiming it will hurt free speech. Beck is quoted as saying, "it will change absolutely everything." Dear Glenn, I absolutely hope so.
Maye Ralston writes stories, essays, and books. She writes opinion editorials and essays for The Sage, is a member of the Midwest Writers Workshop Planning Committee, and blogs at Writing Heartland.
(Cropped) Photo: Some Rights Reserved by Jeff Hester Flickr Photostream, The Sage nor this article endorsed. The original image can be found here.
More Opinion News
-
Cork and the Geez Talk Oscars
Monday, February 27, 2017
The Old Coot & the Geezer analyze what went wrong and what went right at the Academy Awards this year, review the show, and recommend who should host next year. The duo are America's most respected fuddy-duddy film ...
-
Cork and the Geez Dish on the Golden Globes
Tuesday, January 24, 2017
(SNN) The Old Coot and the Geezer, affected no doubt by the rainy weather in Southern California turn grumpy as they analyze the Golden Globes and show what they mean--mostly good food for the media. Will Hollywood ...
-
Revisiting "Two-a-Days" with One Small Difference
Thursday, October 06, 2016
(SNN) For four years of high school and one in college, I would spend a couple of weeks during the dog days of August involved in what was known as "Two-a-days." Those, as any current or former football player ...
-
Coping with the Wobblies
Sunday, September 18, 2016
(SNN) Belonging to an elite group is only fun if it was one you aspired to, like giving a hundred speeches and becoming a Distinguished Toastmaster. During that time I would get the “wobblies” almost weekly. “What’s ...
-
Experimental Turkeys & Murphy's Law
Friday, September 16, 2016
(SNN) It is a paradox of science that before any breakthrough there is often a f’ed-up earlier stage. Out of this f’ed-stage have come some turkeys – turkeys that crossed the road to find something of value on the ...
-
Adventures in Eating
Sunday, August 21, 2016
(SNN) Some food combinations reside in the collective unconscious – and then there are those that shouldn’t exist at all. That special is a lottery. Visible from my apartment is a restaurant that has been struggling ...
-
No More Miscarriage Taboo
Friday, June 24, 2016
(SNN) I got a tattoo recently to honor the life and death of my daughter. The potential of her. The possibility of her. The scarred grief of her that tore up my heart. The fact that she was not born alive did not ...
-
Since the Pulse Stopped
Tuesday, June 21, 2016
Since 'the Pulse stopped,' I've been thinking a few things. (SNN) The other day 49 human beings were murdered, and 53 more were injured in an attempt to murder them, simply for being in a "Gay" nightclub called ...
-
Fall Down, Go Boom
Tuesday, March 22, 2016
(SNN) My doctor has asked me to not fall down. I’ve attempted to honor his request, but it's easier said than done. Staying upright cannot be taken for granted if, like me, you own a fused ankle, Silly Putty knee ...
-
Character Actors: Not Just In It to Win It
Friday, January 29, 2016
(SNN) The death this week of actor Abe Vigoda at 94 reminds us that there are degrees of success of Hollywood, that fame can come after thirty years of toiling in obscurity, and that a great actor is a great actor ...